I am happy to present a guest post this week from one of my favorite bloggers, Leah Goldrick. Leah became a practicing Stoic as a result of her ongoing inquiry into the Western wisdom traditions. She holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Philosophy and a Masters in Library and Information Science from Rutgers University. She used to be an archivist and is now a part-time children’s librarian and blogger. Her website is Common Sense Ethics. 

One really daunting aspect of modern life is that we are often busy, harried, and trying to multitask. A distracted state of mind can actually be an impediment to empathy, which forms the basis of our moral convictions.

Psychological studies have shown that people’s ethical behavior is often out of sync with their sincerely held moral beliefs. Disturbing examples of this phenomenon include the Stanford Prison Experiments, where subjects tasked with being prison “guards” became increasingly more brutal towards “inmates.” A less well known study, conducted by Darley and Batson among seminarians, found that students who said they wanted to enter the ministry in order to help people were likely to ignore a person in distress depending on the circumstances.

Does the Darley and Batson study indicate that people actually aren’t as moral as they think they are? Maybe. Or is it that people are just so mindlessly busy and self-absorbed that they don’t stop to focus on what is happening around them? Does distraction act as an impediment to helping others?

Epictetus argued that mindfulness, also known as prosoche (which can be translated as “attention”), is essential for living an ethical life. Mindfulness is the antidote to the distracted, self-absorbed state that many people walk around in.

The Darley and Batson study was based on the Biblical parable of the Good Samaritan, who stopped on the road to assist a man beaten and left for dead by robbers. The study is summarized in Malcom Gladwell’s book The Tipping Point (2000):

Darley and Batson met with a group of seminarians, individually, and asked each one to prepare a short, extemporaneous talk on a given biblical theme, then walk over to a nearby building to present it. Along the way to the presentation, each student ran into a man slumped in an alley, head down, eyes closed, coughing and groaning. The question was, who would stop and help?

The common variable that made the test subjects unlikely to stop and help was being told that they were running late for their presentation. Many of the “late” students didn’t stop to help the person in distress, even after literally having just been reminded about the Good Samaritan by the researchers.

Martin Luther King pointed out that what is notable about the story of the Good Samaritan, is rather than worrying about inconvenience to himself if he stopped, the Samaritan wondered, “If I do not help this man, what will happen to him?”

Distractedness as an Impediment to Empathy

Empathy provides a basis for morality. We would want someone to stop and help us if we needed help, so we should do the same for others. But it’s harder to focus on that when we are in a hurry or distracted.

Gladwell thinks:

What this study is suggesting, in other words, is that the convictions of your heart and the actual contents of your thoughts are less important, in the end, in guiding your actions than the immediate context of your behavior. The words “Oh, you’re late” had the effect of making someone who was ordinarily compassionate into someone who was indifferent to suffering—of turning someone, in that particular moment, into a different person.


I don’t share Gladwell’s conclusion about this particular study – that convictions and thoughts are less important than the context of behavior. My view is that it’s our state of mind, not the situation per se, that matters. It seems that the test subjects were so busy rushing around that their distraction became an impediment to acting in accord with their moral beliefs.
You see, sometimes we are so harried trying to get something done that we have tunnel vision and we ignore other things. In the moment, we forget to align our thoughts with the convictions of our hearts, as Gladwell puts it.

Focus Your Mind Attentively

The Stoics believed that maintaining mindfulness, or prosoche, is a vital part of life. Prosoche is the ability to apply key ethical precepts to everyday situations, specifically by focusing on acting in ways which befit a benevolent social being.

Marcus Aurelius thinks that we can avoid tunnel vision and cultivate mindfulness by bringing our thoughts back to the task at hand: “Every hour focus your mind attentively…on the performance of the task in hand, with dignity, human sympathy, benevolence and freedom, and leave aside all other thoughts. You will achieve this, if you perform each action as if it were your last…” (Meditations 2.5).

Epictetus noted that once you lose mindfulness, you lose your perspective: “Do you not realize that when once you have let your mind go wandering, it is no longer in your power to recall it, to bring it back to what is right, to self-respect, to moderation?” (Discourses 4.12).

I frequently have to tell myself to stop, slow down, and focus exclusively on what I am doing or what is happening around me, instead of thinking about the next thing I want to get done.

I’m much more likely to ignore something or to be short-tempered with someone when I lose perspective on the moment. The key is being present enough to notice my mind wandering and return to prosoche.

2 thoughts on “Why Rushing Through Life Makes You Less Likely to Help Others

  1. Excellent piece here. Quite rich in implications to mull over.

    It strikes me that there’s a number of approaches that identify “distraction” as the problem it, and then redirect us towards paying attention to what is in front of us. The Stoics certainly offer a strong framework for doing so.

    Among those, I’d say the Christian monastic literature that discusses “acedia” – e.g. John Cassian’s works – which later gets rolled into the vice of “sloth” is quite useful. Much later on, existentialist thinkers like Gabriel Marcel, who discusses “availability” towards others as a key way of being to be developed would be along similar lines.

    Like

    1. Thank you Greg!

      You bring a broad perspective on interesting source materials to read beyond the Stoic ones. I’m reminded of a John Randolph of Roanoke quote that I quite like: “Providence moves slowly, but the devil always hurries.”

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s